Court remands ex-SGF Babachir Lawal in EFCC custody
Sacked
Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Babachir Lawal, has been
remanded in the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
The
Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court presided over by Justice Jude Okeke
ordered his detention after the commission arraigned him yesterday alongside
three others, Hamidu David Lawal, a director of Rholavision Engineering Limited;
an employee of the company, Sulaiman Abubakar, and the Managing Director of
Josmon Technologies Limited, Apeh John, on a 10-count charge bordering on
corruption.
The
accused were said to have committed the offences contrary to Section 26(1)(C)
of the Corrupt Practices and other related Offences Act 2000 and punishable
under Section 12 of same law.
When the
charges were read yesterday, the ex-scribe pleaded not guilty while his
counsel, Chief Akin Olujinmi (SAN), applied for bail.
The court ruled that he should be
remanded while his bail application would be heard today.
Meanwhile, as the trial of the
suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Walter Onnoghen, at the Code of
Conduct Tribunal (CCT), Abuja resumes today, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA)
has called on the Federal Government to discontinue the charge in the interest
of due process.
The body said it had become necessary
due to the fact that one of the two petitions against the jurist before the
National Judicial Council (NJC) was same with the one that motivated the CCT
charge.
In a statement yesterday, NBA
president, Paul Usoro (SAN), commended the Federal Government, represented by
the EFCC, for adhering to due process by submitting the second petition to the
NJC for consideration.
The lawyers’ body said: “In like
manner and in adherence to the law and due process, we urge the Federal
Government to discontinue the CCT charge and allow the NJC consider the initial
petition which, as widely reported, has already been responded to by the CJN.
“Second, the chairman of the CCT,
Danladi Umar, in his response to a petition that was written against him and
which was forwarded to him by the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC),
states emphatically that he and his tribunal are answerable and report only to
the presidency.”
NBA therefore argued that it would
mock the concept of constitutional separation of powers and completely erode
the independence of the judiciary that should exist between the three arms of
government if the CJN, the head of an independent arm of government, is made to
stand trial before a tribunal whose chairman sees himself and his tribunal as
being under and answerable to the presidency only.
According to the organisation, it is
precisely for this reason that the constitution created the NJC to remove any
misperceptions, expressing pleasure that government had warmed up to the
utilisation of that due process, as illustrated by the submission of the EFCC
petition to the NJC.
It stated: “The spectacle of having
our CJN, while still holding that title, in the dock before the CCT or any
other court, truly diminishes all of us, not least the executive arm of
government. The NJC process allows an initial determination to be made on the
petitions against the CJN and if His Lordship is found liable or wanting
howsoever, appropriate sanctions would be imposed by the NJC including
recommendation for his dismissal or retirement.”
Comments
Post a Comment